Theme Layout

Boxed or Wide or Framed

Theme Translation

Display Featured Slider

Featured Slider Styles

Boxedwidth

Display Trending Posts

Display Instagram Footer

yes

Dark or Light Style

How your one email harms environment


Sending a text message or email, eating an apple or watching TV -- each of these activities has a different carbon footprint.

People around the world are getting ready to mark Earth Hour by turning out the lights on March 28, but a long list of seemingly harmless everyday actions also contribute to emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other planet-harming greenhouse gases.

Total global emissions in 2010 were estimated at 49 gigatonnes (Gt or billion tonnes) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e).

Email and internet
Even a short email is estimated to have a footprint of four grammes (0.14 ounces) of CO2e (gCO2e) -- including greenhouse gases produced in running the computer, server and routers and a part of their manufacture.

An email with a large attachment emits about 50 gCO2e, and a spam message, not even opened by the recipient, is responsible for 0.3 gCO2e.

The annual global footprint of spam is equivalent to 3.1 million passenger cars on the road in a year, using two billion gallons (7.6 billion litres) of gasoline.

A web search on an energy-efficient laptop leaves a footprint of 0.2 gCO2e, and on an old desktop computer some 4.5 gCO2e.

A cellphone text message comes at a cost of about 0.014 gCO2e.

Shopping
A plastic carrier bag leaves a footprint of 10 gCO2e, and a paper bag 40 gCO2e.

Drinking
A pint (473 millilitres) of water from the tap generates 0.14 gCO2e compared to 160 gCO2e for a 500 ml store-bought bottle.

A large cappuccino comes at 235 gCO2e, compared to 21 gCO2e for a cup of black coffee or tea for which just enough water was boiled.

Leisure
An hour of TV watching on a 15-inch (38-centimetre) LCD screen yields 34 gCO2e, compared to 88 gCO2e on a 32-inch LCD screen, and 220 gCO2e on a 24-inch plasma screen.

A mile of cycling powered by a meal of bananas would be responsible for 65 gCO2e, compared to 260 gCO2e for a mile powered by cheeseburgers.

Sources:
"How Bad Are Bananas" by Mike Berners-Lee, Fifth Assessment Report of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, McAfee study "Carbon Footprint of Spam".
QuickEdit

You Might Also Like

No comments

Post a Comment

Follow @MyInstantSearch